Endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­ons

The ute­ri­ne lining plays a cru­cial role in implan­ta­ti­on and the ear­ly deve­lo­p­ment of a pregnan­cy. In sel­ec­ted situa­tions, fur­ther inves­ti­ga­ti­ons of the endo­me­tri­um may the­r­e­fo­re be useful in cases of repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure or recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges.

The focus is in par­ti­cu­lar on test­ing for chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis, an inflamm­a­ti­on of the ute­ri­ne lining that often cau­ses few sym­ptoms and can be dia­gno­sed by detec­ting CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells in an endo­me­tri­al bio­psy.

In addi­ti­on, depen­ding on your indi­vi­du­al medi­cal histo­ry, other endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­ons may be con­side­red, such as an ana­ly­sis of the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me. The sci­en­ti­fic evi­dence for the­se pro­ce­du­res varies: in par­ti­cu­lar, the signi­fi­can­ce of the ute­ri­ne micro­bio­me, opti­mal cut-off values, and the bene­fit of the­ra­pies deri­ved from it are still being inves­ti­ga­ted sci­en­ti­fi­cal­ly.

When are endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­ons useful in cases of an as-yet unful­fil­led wish to have a child?

Fur­ther inves­ti­ga­ti­ons of the ute­ri­ne lining are not part of rou­ti­ne basic fer­ti­li­ty dia­gno­stics. They may be con­side­red in par­ti­cu­lar if pregnan­ci­es repea­ted­ly do not occur or if the­re are recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges. Which test is appro­pria­te depends on the indi­vi­du­al medi­cal histo­ry.

Logo Ikon Repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure

If pregnan­cy does not occur despi­te repea­ted trans­fers of good-qua­li­ty embry­os, fur­ther inves­ti­ga­ti­on of the endo­me­tri­um may be useful. In par­ti­cu­lar, chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis can be asses­sed by detec­ting CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells. In sel­ec­ted cases, a micro­bio­me ana­ly­sis or spe­cial inves­ti­ga­ti­ons such as ute­ri­ne kil­ler cells may also be dis­cus­sed. Howe­ver, the cli­ni­cal bene­fit of the­se addi­tio­nal tests has not yet been cle­ar­ly estab­lished.

Logo Ikon Recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges

In cases of recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges, chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis can be inves­ti­ga­ted as a pos­si­ble addi­tio­nal fac­tor. For this pur­po­se, a small sam­ple of the ute­ri­ne lining is taken and exami­ned for CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells. Micro­bio­me and immu­no­lo­gi­cal inves­ti­ga­ti­ons may be dis­cus­sed as an adjunct in spe­cial con­stel­la­ti­ons, but they are not part of rou­ti­ne­ly recom­men­ded mis­car­ria­ge dia­gno­stics.

Logo Ikon Suspec­ted chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis

Chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis often cau­ses no sym­ptoms or only non-spe­ci­fic sym­ptoms and may the­r­e­fo­re go unno­ti­ced. If the medi­cal histo­ry sug­gests it, an endo­me­tri­al bio­psy with test­ing for CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells can pro­vi­de indi­ca­ti­ons of chro­nic inflamm­a­ti­on. Depen­ding on the fin­dings and the cli­ni­cal ques­ti­on, an addi­tio­nal micro­bio­lo­gi­cal or mole­cu­lar bio­lo­gi­cal test for spe­ci­fic patho­gens or the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me may be useful.

Couple in the waiting area of the fertility center The Kinderwunschärztin in Munich
Logo Ikon

What endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­ons are available?

We the­r­e­fo­re do not recom­mend exten­ded endo­me­tri­al dia­gno­stics rou­ti­ne­ly, but rather sel­ec­tively based on your indi­vi­du­al medi­cal histo­ry and pre­vious fer­ti­li­ty tre­at­ment.

CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS & CD138-POSITIVE PLASMA CELLS

Chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis is an inflamm­a­ti­on of the ute­ri­ne lining that usual­ly cau­ses few sym­ptoms or goes com­ple­te­ly unno­ti­ced. It is asso­cia­ted with recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges and pos­si­bly also with repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure.

For dia­gno­sis, we take a small sam­ple of the ute­ri­ne lining. This is exami­ned his­to­lo­gi­cal­ly and, in par­ti­cu­lar, che­cked for CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells. Evi­dence of increased plas­ma cells may indi­ca­te chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis.

Howe­ver, the­re is curr­ent­ly no inter­na­tio­nal­ly uni­form cut-off value for the num­ber of plas­ma cells abo­ve which cli­ni­cal­ly rele­vant chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis is pre­sent. We the­r­e­fo­re always assess the fin­dings in the con­text of your indi­vi­du­al medi­cal histo­ry and pre­vious fer­ti­li­ty tre­at­ments.

If cli­ni­cal­ly rele­vant chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis is dia­gno­sed, anti­bio­tic tre­at­ment may be con­side­red. Stu­dies show more favorable repro­duc­ti­ve out­co­mes, par­ti­cu­lar­ly when chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis is no lon­ger detec­ta­ble after tre­at­ment; at the same time, the evi­dence on impro­ving the live birth rate has not yet been con­clu­si­ve­ly cla­ri­fied.

Make an appoint­ment
ENDOMETRIAL MICROBIOME

The endo­me­tri­um is the lining that covers the insi­de of the ute­rus. It is colo­ni­zed by bac­te­ria, pri­ma­ri­ly pro­tec­ti­ve lac­to­ba­cil­li (lac­tic acid bac­te­ria). Modern mole­cu­lar bio­lo­gi­cal methods can detect bac­te­ri­al DNA and dif­fe­rent bac­te­ri­al pro­files in the endo­me­tri­um. Among other things, this exami­nes whe­ther lac­to­ba­cil­li domi­na­te or whe­ther the­re are indi­ca­ti­ons of so-cal­led dysbiosis—an alte­red bac­te­ri­al com­po­si­ti­on.

Stu­dies show asso­cia­ti­ons bet­ween cer­tain micro­bi­al pat­terns and the chan­ces of pregnan­cy. Howe­ver, it has not yet been con­clu­si­ve­ly cla­ri­fied how an “opti­mal” endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me should be defi­ned, which cut-off values are cli­ni­cal­ly rele­vant, and whe­ther tar­ge­ted modi­fi­ca­ti­on of the micro­bio­me impro­ves pregnan­cy or live birth rates. The micro­bio­me ana­ly­sis is the­r­e­fo­re not a rou­ti­ne test. In sel­ec­ted patients—especially after repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure and in con­junc­tion with fur­ther indi­ca­ti­ons of chro­nic endometritis—it can be used as an addi­tio­nal dia­gno­stic tool.

Make an appoint­ment
UTERINE NATURAL KILLER CELLS (uNK)

Ute­ri­ne natu­ral kil­ler cells are a natu­ral com­po­nent of the immu­ne sys­tem of the ute­ri­ne lining and play an important role in implan­ta­ti­on, pla­cen­tal deve­lo­p­ment, and immu­no­lo­gi­cal com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on bet­ween mother and embryo.

In cases of repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure or mis­car­ri­a­ges, the num­ber and func­tion of the­se cells are being inten­si­ve­ly stu­di­ed sci­en­ti­fi­cal­ly. Howe­ver, the­re are still no uni­form refe­rence ran­ges and suf­fi­ci­ent­ly vali­da­ted methods to relia­bly deri­ve a cau­se or the­ra­py from an increased or decreased uNK value.

Deter­mi­ning ute­ri­ne NK cells is the­r­e­fo­re not part of rou­ti­ne­ly recom­men­ded fer­ti­li­ty dia­gno­stics. In spe­cial situa­tions, par­ti­cu­lar­ly after repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure, it may be per­for­med as an addi­tio­nal test fol­lo­wing indi­vi­du­al coun­seling.

Make an appoint­ment

What role does the micro­bio­me play when try­ing to con­cei­ve?

The ute­ri­ne lining plays a cen­tral role in the implan­ta­ti­on of an embryo. In recent years, inten­si­ve rese­arch has the­r­e­fo­re exami­ned whe­ther chro­nic inflamm­a­ti­on and chan­ges in the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me can con­tri­bu­te to repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure or mis­car­ri­a­ges.

Chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis is par­ti­cu­lar­ly rele­vant. This per­sis­tent inflamm­a­ti­on of the ute­ri­ne lining often cau­ses no sym­ptoms and the­r­e­fo­re usual­ly remains unde­tec­ted wit­hout tar­ge­ted test­ing. It can be detec­ted by an endo­me­tri­al bio­psy and test­ing for CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells. The cli­ni­cal evi­dence for this dia­gno­stic approach is stron­ger than for many other spe­cia­li­zed endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­ons.

Stu­dies also show asso­cia­ti­ons bet­ween chan­ges in the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me and implan­ta­ti­on and the cour­se of pregnan­cy. Among other things, redu­ced domi­nan­ce of lac­to­ba­cil­li and an increased pre­sence of cer­tain other bac­te­ria are being inves­ti­ga­ted. Howe­ver, it has not yet been con­clu­si­ve­ly cla­ri­fied which com­po­si­ti­on of the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me should be con­side­red opti­mal and whe­ther tar­ge­ted tre­at­ment of dys­bio­sis impro­ves pregnan­cy or live birth rates.

In our view, exten­ded endo­me­tri­al dia­gno­stics should the­r­e­fo­re not be per­for­med rou­ti­ne­ly for every pati­ent try­ing to con­cei­ve. Howe­ver, in cases of repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure, recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges, or sel­ec­ted com­plex fer­ti­li­ty his­to­ries, it can pro­vi­de addi­tio­nal infor­ma­ti­on. Which test is appro­pria­te in an indi­vi­du­al case is deci­ded based on your medi­cal histo­ry, pre­vious tre­at­ments, and exis­ting findings—also taking into account the vary­ing sci­en­ti­fic evi­dence for the indi­vi­du­al pro­ce­du­res.

Addi­tio­nal dia­gno­stics when try­ing to con­cei­ve

HORMONAL DIAGNOSTICS

Hor­mo­n­al fac­tors can influence the cycle, ovu­la­ti­on, and the build-up of the ute­ri­ne lining. Depen­ding on the cli­ni­cal ques­ti­on, we may exami­ne, for exam­p­le, thy­ro­id values, pro­lac­tin, est­ra­di­ol and pro­ges­te­ro­ne, as well as other hor­mo­nes, in order to iden­ti­fy pos­si­ble hor­mo­n­al cau­ses.

Hys­tero­sco­py

A hys­tero­sco­py allows the ute­ri­ne cavi­ty to be asses­sed direct­ly. For exam­p­le, polyps, submu­co­sal fibro­ids, adhe­si­ons, or other chan­ges that may impair implan­ta­ti­on can be detec­ted. If nee­ded, tar­ge­ted tis­sue samples can also be taken during the pro­ce­du­re.

Other cau­ses of implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure and mis­car­ri­a­ges

In cases of repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure or recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges, we do not only look at the ute­ri­ne lining. Depen­ding on your medi­cal histo­ry, fur­ther inves­ti­ga­ti­ons may be useful—for exam­p­le, of ute­ri­ne ana­to­my, gene­tics, coagu­la­ti­on, immu­no­lo­gy, or male fac­tors.

Pro­ce­du­re for endo­me­tri­al dia­gno­stics

At our pri­va­te fer­ti­li­ty cen­ter in Munich, we gui­de you step by step through dia­gno­stics and pos­si­ble tre­at­ment opti­ons. Which test is appro­pria­te and when the tis­sue sam­ple is taken depends on the spe­ci­fic cli­ni­cal ques­ti­on. Some tests can be per­for­med fle­xi­bly within the cycle, while others requi­re a pre­cis­e­ly defi­ned time point.

  1. Indi­vi­du­al plan­ning

    First, we dis­cuss which endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­on is appro­pria­te in your situa­ti­on. The timing of the bio­psy is plan­ned accor­din­gly: tests for chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis or CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells and the micro­bio­me can gene­ral­ly be per­for­med in dif­fe­rent pha­ses of the cycle. Spe­cial tests such as ute­ri­ne kil­ler cells, on the other hand, requi­re a spe­ci­fi­cal­ly defi­ned time point in the cycle, in the lute­al pha­se.

    Make an appoint­ment
  2. Taking the tis­sue sam­ple

    Using a thin cathe­ter, we take a small sam­ple of the ute­ri­ne lining. The exami­na­ti­on takes only a few minu­tes and is usual­ly per­for­med on an out­pa­ti­ent basis. Depen­ding on the test, the bio­psy is per­for­med, for exam­p­le, in the first half of the cycle, around ovu­la­ti­on, or spe­ci­fi­cal­ly in the second half of the cycle.

  3. Labo­ra­to­ry ana­ly­sis

    Depen­ding on the cli­ni­cal ques­ti­on, the sam­ple is exami­ned in dif­fe­rent ways. Opti­ons include his­to­lo­gi­cal and immu­n­o­hi­s­to­che­mi­cal test­ing for CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells, a mole­cu­lar bio­lo­gi­cal ana­ly­sis of the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me, or deter­mi­na­ti­on of ute­ri­ne kil­ler cells.

  4. Dis­cus­sion of results

    Once the results are available, we dis­cuss the fin­dings with you in detail and inter­pret them tog­e­ther in the con­text of your medi­cal histo­ry and pre­vious fer­ti­li­ty tre­at­ments. Espe­ci­al­ly with spe­cia­li­zed endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­ons, it is important not to assess indi­vi­du­al labo­ra­to­ry values in iso­la­ti­on.

  5. Indi­vi­du­al Tre­at­ment

    If chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis is con­firm­ed, for exam­p­le, anti­bio­tic the­ra­py may be appro­pria­te. In the case of micro­bio­me chan­ges or other abnor­ma­li­ties, we assess indi­vi­du­al­ly whe­ther this leads to a the­ra­peu­tic con­se­quence. In doing so, we also take into account the vary­ing sci­en­ti­fic evi­dence for the respec­ti­ve tre­at­ment.

Close-up of a flower vase in the bright practice atmosphere at the fertility center in Munich for a relaxed consultation.

Endo­me­tri­al dia­gno­stics in Munich – indi­vi­dua­li­zed and evi­dence-based

With spe­cia­li­zed inves­ti­ga­ti­ons of the ute­ri­ne lining, it is not only the labo­ra­to­ry fin­ding that mat­ters, but abo­ve all its inter­pre­ta­ti­on in the con­text of your indi­vi­du­al fer­ti­li­ty histo­ry.

Arran­ge a con­sul­ta­ti­on appoint­ment
  • Time & trust

    In a calm, pro­tec­ted atmo­sphe­re, we take suf­fi­ci­ent time for your ques­ti­ons and concerns—sensitively and on an equal foo­ting, from woman to woman.

  • Spe­cia­li­sed expe­ri­ence

    We have many years of expe­ri­ence in caring for pati­ents with repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure, recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges, and com­plex fer­ti­li­ty his­to­ries.

  • Tar­ge­ted dia­gno­stics

    Not every available test is useful for every pati­ent. We deci­de indi­vi­du­al­ly which endo­me­tri­al dia­gno­stics can pro­vi­de addi­tio­nal insights based on your medi­cal histo­ry and pre­vious fin­dings.

  • Dif­fe­ren­tia­ted inter­pre­ta­ti­on of fin­dings

    Whe­ther CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells, the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me, or spe­cia­li­zed addi­tio­nal dia­gno­stics: we do not view results in iso­la­ti­on, but tog­e­ther with your pre­vious tre­at­ments and other pos­si­ble cau­ses.

  • Evi­dence-based coun­seling

    The sci­en­ti­fic evi­dence is not the same for all endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­ons. We dis­cuss trans­par­ent­ly with you what is well stu­di­ed, whe­re sci­en­ti­fic uncer­tain­ties remain, and which the­ra­peu­tic con­se­quen­ces can reason­ab­ly be deri­ved from this.

 

What Our Pati­ents Say

Posted on Google Google
Sandra B
84 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Had a very good experience, I felt very well taken care of, everyone very professional, standardized routines, can definitely recommend
Posted on Google Google
Lauren W
120 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We flew from overseas to work with Dr Mann and her team. Everyone was so kind, empathetic and extremely helpful. Everyone spoke English and made us feel very welcome. We could not have asked for better care than what we received from Dr Mann and her team. Bonus, the offices are beautiful.
Posted on Google Google
Andrea C
164 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
After visiting two other fertility clinics (one of which I left in tears), I had almost lost hope of finding a place where I would truly feel heard. Then I met Dr. Sarah Comploj, and everything changed. From the very first consultation, I felt genuinely listened to and treated as an individual. Unlike my previous experiences, where I was quickly told I needed IVF without anyone really taking the time to understand my situation or carefully review my test results, here I felt that my case truly mattered. Every step was explained thoughtfully, and my concerns were taken seriously. What stood out the most was that I never felt like just another patient or that the focus was on money. Instead, I felt that the entire team was committed to helping me achieve my dream in the most appropriate and personal way possible. Today, I am holding my one-month-old baby in my arms, and I will forever be grateful for the care, compassion, and expertise I received here. I can only highly recommend this clinic and Dr. Comploj 🩷
Posted on Google Google
Viktoria O
302 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Every appointment I’ve had over the last few months has been consistently informative, professional, and conducted in a personal manner. The treatment plan was explained in detail and any concerns or questions always answered. She also speaks perfect English if required. I’m impressed with how well organised the clinic is and how quickly results are processed, and last-minute appointments made available. For anyone who is going through the struggle of infertility it’s a difficult and vulnerable time, but I always felt so reassured and in good hands with Dr Mann.
Posted on Google Google
Local R
310 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
A heartfelt thank you to Dr. Gerber for the exceptional support and warmth during a very sensitive journey. I always felt respected and in good hands. Truly grateful.
Posted on Google Google
V D
431 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I'm very grateful for my experience, the staff from reception to the doctors were very kind. You can feel accompanied during the treatment. Also, overall I had a successful treatment, especially considering my age, it's a costly treatment but it's worth it. So I'm very happy for the result, my doctor was Sara Comploj.
Posted on Google Google
Marina
468 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a wonderful experience with the Kinderwunsch practice, and especially with dr. Corina Mann. From the very beginning, dr Mann was attentive, knowledgeable, and truly invested in helping me achieve the best possible outcome. She took the time to understand my goals and tailored my treatment plan to make sure I had the best chance of success. Thanks to her care and expertise, I was able to maximise my results and reach my goals. I always felt supported, informed, and in the best hands. Dr Mann always answered my countless questions with a smile :) I’m incredibly grateful for her dedication and would wholeheartedly recommend her to anyone starting their fertility journey.
Posted on Google Google
Carmencita
470 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I just want to say a big thank you to the whole team of Dr. Mann and Dr. Albrecht. I felt really taking care off in this Praxis and really can recommend everyone to go to this clinic, as here you can get at least the most possible personalization and time dedicated to you! Thanks again for your support!
Posted on Google Google
Maria K
566 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Since my doctor was busy and couldn't do the procedure herself, I had an appointment with Sarah to have my fallopian tubes checked. I was very nervous before the procedure, but it turned out to be for nothing! Sarah described and explained every step of the procedure and was extremely friendly.
Posted on Google Google
Jay B
1128 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Our multiple years-long Kinderwunsch journey was spent under the care of Dr. Mann and her Kinderwunsch practice team. Dr. Mann is not only a highly competent expert in her field, she's also empathetic and kind. She treated each appointment with a sense of being genuinely invested — listening to concerns or questions, planning for my unique treatment needs, and explaining processes or procedures without rushing (because she knows it's likely your first time going through something ... even though it might be her 40000th time). Her practice is busy and it's because she's the best. The practice team is cheerful and helpful. The waiting area is comfortable with pleasant music, flowers, and they even laid out gingerbread during Christmas time. They have a lab on-site so results are often same-day. I particularly found the technology they use to share results via email quickly so helpful. And I always felt at ease speaking in my native language and not pressured to try to keep up with unfamiliar German terminology. I'm forever grateful to have found Dr. Mann. We plan to visit soon with our new plus-one :) - RB & JB
Posted on Google Google
Aparna P
1628 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dr.Albrecht is really good and friendly. She is best at her own way. But reception staff is very very very worst and disappointing. They themselves book an appointment and say it’s not booked. Luckily in Doctorlib my appointment was visible. Staff is very very rude. And they respond very rudely. I can give 0 rating for Staff at reception.
Posted on Google Google
Cindy L
1649 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We had an absolutely wonderful experience with Dr. Mann. Her positive energy and competence was so reassuring and much appreciated during the potentially stressful time of trying to have a baby. I really loved how we could communicate in either English or German over complicated and sensitive reproductive matters. She took the time to answer all of our questions and offered us a wealth of information regarding the treatments. And her staff brought the same good vibes and Expertise to the practice. Some of the best and painless blood draws I’ve ever had, and they were always very responsive through emails as well as telephone communication. Online appointment system was also great. Video consults super convenient. The setting of the practice itself is an oasis of peace and calmness. As soon as I stepped through the doors I felt relaxed with the music, green plant wall, and well designed and decorated space. Technology and quality of equipment is very good. Yes, sometimes the waiting time had been 30+ minutes, but because the patient care is so excellent, I’ll be back for future treatments as needed, and would highly recommend this practice and team to anyone.
Posted on Google Google
Raluca O
1833 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have only the best words to describe my experience at the clinic. I personally worked with Dr. Albrecht and she was amazing. Every appointment was done on time, informative and clear on what the next steps are. She offered details and support with my every question. Where I wasn’t sure of my German we swapped to English to make sure I understood everything. The clinic is run in a very efficient way, organized, planned and as a process oriented person I loved it!
Logo Ikon

Cos­ts of endo­me­tri­al dia­gno­stics in Munich

Endo­me­tri­al bio­psy (micro­bio­me, ute­ri­ne kil­ler cells, ERA) — approx. €200

In addi­ti­on, the­re are cos­ts for the exter­nal labo­ra­to­ries that ana­ly­ze the samples. The­se ser­vices are bil­led to you direct­ly by the exter­nal labo­ra­to­ry.

Make an appoint­ment
Notes on Bil­ling

No fixed or flat-rate pri­ces: We bill on the basis of the offi­ci­al sca­le of fees for doc­tors (GOÄ). Accor­ding to the GOÄ, we are not allo­wed to quo­te fixed or flat-rate pri­ces for medi­cal ser­vices. The pri­ces men­tio­ned are inten­ded to pro­vi­de ori­en­ta­ti­on and are typi­cal for the tre­at­ments men­tio­ned.

Pos­si­ble VAT lia­bi­li­ty: Medi­cal ser­vices may be sub­ject to VAT (curr­ent­ly 19%). This appli­es if, after dia­gno­stics have been car­ri­ed out, no medi­cal indi­ca­ti­on or con­firm­ed dia­gno­sis is pre­sent and it is the­r­e­fo­re not a medi­cal tre­at­ment in the strict sen­se. This can be the case in par­ti­cu­lar with social free­zing tre­at­ments, but also with the tre­at­ment of sin­gle moms and same-sex cou­ples.

Note on Cost Covera­ge

We would be hap­py to pro­vi­de you with detail­ed cost infor­ma­ti­on for the plan­ned tre­at­ment in advan­ce. This allows you to cla­ri­fy cost covera­ge with your pri­va­te health insu­rance (PKV) as best as pos­si­ble before­hand. Sta­tu­to­ry health insu­rance (GKV) does not cover cos­ts at our cen­ter.

Fre­quent­ly asked ques­ti­ons about endo­me­tri­al dia­gno­stics for an unful­fil­led wish to have a child

What is chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis (CE) and what role does it play when try­ing to con­cei­ve?

Chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis is an inflamm­a­ti­on of the ute­ri­ne lining that usual­ly cau­ses few sym­ptoms or goes unno­ti­ced. It is asso­cia­ted with repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure and recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges and can the­r­e­fo­re be inves­ti­ga­ted as a pos­si­ble addi­tio­nal fac­tor in rele­vant fer­ti­li­ty his­to­ries. Becau­se chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis often does not cau­se typi­cal sym­ptoms, a tar­ge­ted exami­na­ti­on of the ute­ri­ne lining is usual­ly requi­red for dia­gno­sis.

How is chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis dia­gno­sed?

For dia­gno­sis, a small tis­sue sam­ple is taken from the ute­ri­ne lining. In the labo­ra­to­ry, it is exami­ned his­to­lo­gi­cal­ly and immu­n­o­hi­s­to­che­mi­cal­ly. Par­ti­cu­lar­ly important is the detec­tion of CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells, which may indi­ca­te chro­nic inflamm­a­ti­on. Sin­ce the­re is curr­ent­ly no inter­na­tio­nal­ly uni­form cut-off value for the num­ber of plas­ma cells, the result should always be asses­sed tog­e­ther with the medi­cal histo­ry and pre­vious fer­ti­li­ty tre­at­ments.

Can chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis impair implan­ta­ti­on or increase the risk of mis­car­ria­ge?

Stu­dies show an asso­cia­ti­on bet­ween chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis and lower pregnan­cy and live birth rates. Its signi­fi­can­ce is being inves­ti­ga­ted par­ti­cu­lar­ly in cases of repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure and recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges. Howe­ver, whe­ther chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis is actual­ly the cau­se of the absence of pregnan­cy or a mis­car­ria­ge in an indi­vi­du­al case can­not be deter­mi­ned on the basis of the fin­ding alo­ne.

How is chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis trea­ted?

In cases of cli­ni­cal­ly rele­vant chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis, anti­bio­tic tre­at­ment may be appro­pria­te. Depen­ding on the initi­al fin­dings and the indi­vi­du­al situa­ti­on, a repeat endo­me­tri­al bio­psy may then be per­for­med to check whe­ther the inflamm­a­ti­on has resol­ved. Stu­dies show, in part, hig­her pregnan­cy and live birth rates after suc­cessful­ly trea­ted chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis; howe­ver, the evi­dence is still hete­ro­ge­neous.

What is the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me?

The endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me refers to the tota­li­ty of micro­or­ga­nisms detec­ta­ble in the ute­rus. Stu­dies are curr­ent­ly inves­ti­ga­ting, in par­ti­cu­lar, the signi­fi­can­ce of lac­to­ba­cil­li and other bac­te­ria for the ute­ri­ne lining, implan­ta­ti­on of an embryo, and the cour­se of pregnan­cy. Unli­ke the vagi­nal micro­bio­me, the bac­te­ri­al load in the endo­me­tri­um is very low, which makes test­ing and inter­pre­ta­ti­on par­ti­cu­lar­ly chal­len­ging.

Can a dis­rupt­ed ute­ri­ne micro­bio­me impair implan­ta­ti­on?

Some stu­dies show asso­cia­ti­ons bet­ween cer­tain chan­ges in the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me and lower implan­ta­ti­on, pregnan­cy, or live birth rates. Howe­ver, it has not yet been con­clu­si­ve­ly cla­ri­fied whe­ther the­se chan­ges are actual­ly the cau­se of impai­red implan­ta­ti­on or are mere­ly asso­cia­ted with it. The­re are also no gene­ral­ly accept­ed cut-off values for what an “opti­mal” endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me should look like.

When can a micro­bio­me test be useful when try­ing to con­cei­ve?

Ana­ly­sis of the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me is not part of rou­ti­ne fer­ti­li­ty dia­gno­stics. In sel­ec­ted pati­ents with repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure, recur­rent mis­car­ri­a­ges, or com­plex fer­ti­li­ty his­to­ries, it may be dis­cus­sed as an addi­tio­nal test fol­lo­wing indi­vi­du­al coun­seling.

What are ute­ri­ne kil­ler cells and what is their signi­fi­can­ce when try­ing to con­cei­ve?

Ute­ri­ne natu­ral kil­ler cells (uNK cells) are a nor­mal and important com­po­nent of the immu­ne sys­tem of the ute­ri­ne lining. Among other things, they are invol­ved in implan­ta­ti­on and ear­ly pla­cen­tal deve­lo­p­ment. Whe­ther an increased num­ber or alte­red acti­vi­ty of the­se cells cau­ses repea­ted implan­ta­ti­on fail­ure or mis­car­ri­a­ges has not yet been cle­ar­ly estab­lished.

How is an endo­me­tri­al bio­psy per­for­med, and is it pain­ful?

For an endo­me­tri­al bio­psy, a thin cathe­ter is inser­ted through the cer­vix into the ute­rus and a small sam­ple of the ute­ri­ne lining is taken. The pro­ce­du­re usual­ly takes only a few minu­tes and can be per­for­med on an out­pa­ti­ent basis. During sam­pling, short-term mens­tru­al-like pain or cramps may occur. Anes­the­sia is gene­ral­ly not requi­red.

When in the cycle is an endo­me­tri­al bio­psy per­for­med?

The opti­mal time depends on which endo­me­tri­al inves­ti­ga­ti­on is plan­ned. Test­ing for chro­nic endo­me­tri­tis or CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells can gene­ral­ly be per­for­med in dif­fe­rent pha­ses of the cycle. For other tests, timing is more important: ute­ri­ne kil­ler cells are typi­cal­ly exami­ned in the second half of the cycle. We the­r­e­fo­re plan the timing of the bio­psy indi­vi­du­al­ly accor­ding to the spe­ci­fic cli­ni­cal ques­ti­on.

How much do endo­me­tri­al dia­gno­stics cost, and does health insu­rance cover the cos­ts?

The cos­ts depend on which inves­ti­ga­ti­ons are per­for­med. In addi­ti­on to the endo­me­tri­al bio­psy, cos­ts may ari­se for his­to­lo­gi­cal, immu­n­o­hi­s­to­che­mi­cal, or mole­cu­lar bio­lo­gi­cal analyses—for exam­p­le, for CD138-posi­ti­ve plas­ma cells, the endo­me­tri­al micro­bio­me, or ute­ri­ne kil­ler cells. As a rule, the­se spe­cia­li­zed inves­ti­ga­ti­ons are not cover­ed by sta­tu­to­ry health insu­rance. With pri­va­te health insu­rance, pos­si­ble reim­bur­se­ment depends on the medi­cal indi­ca­ti­on and the indi­vi­du­al plan. We will, of cour­se, inform you of the expec­ted cos­ts befo­re the exami­na­ti­on.