Endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tions

The uter­ine lin­ing plays a cru­cial role in implan­ta­tion and the ear­ly devel­op­ment of a preg­nan­cy. In select­ed sit­u­a­tions, fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tions of the endometri­um may there­fore be use­ful in cas­es of repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure or recur­rent mis­car­riages.

The focus is in par­tic­u­lar on test­ing for chron­ic endometri­tis, an inflam­ma­tion of the uter­ine lin­ing that often caus­es few symp­toms and can be diag­nosed by detect­ing CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells in an endome­tri­al biop­sy.

In addi­tion, depend­ing on your indi­vid­ual med­ical his­to­ry, oth­er endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tions may be con­sid­ered, such as an analy­sis of the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me. The sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence for these pro­ce­dures varies: in par­tic­u­lar, the sig­nif­i­cance of the uter­ine micro­bio­me, opti­mal cut-off val­ues, and the ben­e­fit of ther­a­pies derived from it are still being inves­ti­gat­ed sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly.

When are endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tions use­ful in cas­es of an as-yet unful­filled wish to have a child?

Fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tions of the uter­ine lin­ing are not part of rou­tine basic fer­til­i­ty diag­nos­tics. They may be con­sid­ered in par­tic­u­lar if preg­nan­cies repeat­ed­ly do not occur or if there are recur­rent mis­car­riages. Which test is appro­pri­ate depends on the indi­vid­ual med­ical his­to­ry.

Logo Ikon Repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure

If preg­nan­cy does not occur despite repeat­ed trans­fers of good-qual­i­ty embryos, fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tion of the endometri­um may be use­ful. In par­tic­u­lar, chron­ic endometri­tis can be assessed by detect­ing CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells. In select­ed cas­es, a micro­bio­me analy­sis or spe­cial inves­ti­ga­tions such as uter­ine killer cells may also be dis­cussed. How­ev­er, the clin­i­cal ben­e­fit of these addi­tion­al tests has not yet been clear­ly estab­lished.

Logo Ikon Recur­rent mis­car­riages

In cas­es of recur­rent mis­car­riages, chron­ic endometri­tis can be inves­ti­gat­ed as a pos­si­ble addi­tion­al fac­tor. For this pur­pose, a small sam­ple of the uter­ine lin­ing is tak­en and exam­ined for CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells. Micro­bio­me and immuno­log­i­cal inves­ti­ga­tions may be dis­cussed as an adjunct in spe­cial con­stel­la­tions, but they are not part of rou­tine­ly rec­om­mend­ed mis­car­riage diag­nos­tics.

Logo Ikon Sus­pect­ed chron­ic endometri­tis

Chron­ic endometri­tis often caus­es no symp­toms or only non-spe­cif­ic symp­toms and may there­fore go unno­ticed. If the med­ical his­to­ry sug­gests it, an endome­tri­al biop­sy with test­ing for CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells can pro­vide indi­ca­tions of chron­ic inflam­ma­tion. Depend­ing on the find­ings and the clin­i­cal ques­tion, an addi­tion­al micro­bi­o­log­i­cal or mol­e­c­u­lar bio­log­i­cal test for spe­cif­ic pathogens or the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me may be use­ful.

Couple in the waiting area of the fertility center The Kinderwunschärztin in Munich
Logo Ikon

What endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tions are avail­able?

We there­fore do not rec­om­mend extend­ed endome­tri­al diag­nos­tics rou­tine­ly, but rather selec­tive­ly based on your indi­vid­ual med­ical his­to­ry and pre­vi­ous fer­til­i­ty treat­ment.

CHRONIC ENDOMETRITIS & CD138-POSITIVE PLASMA CELLS

Chron­ic endometri­tis is an inflam­ma­tion of the uter­ine lin­ing that usu­al­ly caus­es few symp­toms or goes com­plete­ly unno­ticed. It is asso­ci­at­ed with recur­rent mis­car­riages and pos­si­bly also with repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure.

For diag­no­sis, we take a small sam­ple of the uter­ine lin­ing. This is exam­ined his­to­log­i­cal­ly and, in par­tic­u­lar, checked for CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells. Evi­dence of increased plas­ma cells may indi­cate chron­ic endometri­tis.

How­ev­er, there is cur­rent­ly no inter­na­tion­al­ly uni­form cut-off val­ue for the num­ber of plas­ma cells above which clin­i­cal­ly rel­e­vant chron­ic endometri­tis is present. We there­fore always assess the find­ings in the con­text of your indi­vid­ual med­ical his­to­ry and pre­vi­ous fer­til­i­ty treat­ments.

If clin­i­cal­ly rel­e­vant chron­ic endometri­tis is diag­nosed, antibi­ot­ic treat­ment may be con­sid­ered. Stud­ies show more favor­able repro­duc­tive out­comes, par­tic­u­lar­ly when chron­ic endometri­tis is no longer detectable after treat­ment; at the same time, the evi­dence on improv­ing the live birth rate has not yet been con­clu­sive­ly clar­i­fied.

Make an appoint­ment
ENDOMETRIAL MICROBIOME

The endometri­um is the lin­ing that cov­ers the inside of the uterus. It is col­o­nized by bac­te­ria, pri­mar­i­ly pro­tec­tive lac­to­bacil­li (lac­tic acid bac­te­ria). Mod­ern mol­e­c­u­lar bio­log­i­cal meth­ods can detect bac­te­r­i­al DNA and dif­fer­ent bac­te­r­i­al pro­files in the endometri­um. Among oth­er things, this exam­ines whether lac­to­bacil­li dom­i­nate or whether there are indi­ca­tions of so-called dysbiosis—an altered bac­te­r­i­al com­po­si­tion.

Stud­ies show asso­ci­a­tions between cer­tain micro­bial pat­terns and the chances of preg­nan­cy. How­ev­er, it has not yet been con­clu­sive­ly clar­i­fied how an “opti­mal” endome­tri­al micro­bio­me should be defined, which cut-off val­ues are clin­i­cal­ly rel­e­vant, and whether tar­get­ed mod­i­fi­ca­tion of the micro­bio­me improves preg­nan­cy or live birth rates. The micro­bio­me analy­sis is there­fore not a rou­tine test. In select­ed patients—especially after repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure and in con­junc­tion with fur­ther indi­ca­tions of chron­ic endometritis—it can be used as an addi­tion­al diag­nos­tic tool.

Make an appoint­ment
UTERINE NATURAL KILLER CELLS (uNK)

Uter­ine nat­ur­al killer cells are a nat­ur­al com­po­nent of the immune sys­tem of the uter­ine lin­ing and play an impor­tant role in implan­ta­tion, pla­cen­tal devel­op­ment, and immuno­log­i­cal com­mu­ni­ca­tion between moth­er and embryo.

In cas­es of repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure or mis­car­riages, the num­ber and func­tion of these cells are being inten­sive­ly stud­ied sci­en­tif­i­cal­ly. How­ev­er, there are still no uni­form ref­er­ence ranges and suf­fi­cient­ly val­i­dat­ed meth­ods to reli­ably derive a cause or ther­a­py from an increased or decreased uNK val­ue.

Deter­min­ing uter­ine NK cells is there­fore not part of rou­tine­ly rec­om­mend­ed fer­til­i­ty diag­nos­tics. In spe­cial sit­u­a­tions, par­tic­u­lar­ly after repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure, it may be per­formed as an addi­tion­al test fol­low­ing indi­vid­ual coun­sel­ing.

Make an appoint­ment

What role does the micro­bio­me play when try­ing to con­ceive?

The uter­ine lin­ing plays a cen­tral role in the implan­ta­tion of an embryo. In recent years, inten­sive research has there­fore exam­ined whether chron­ic inflam­ma­tion and changes in the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me can con­tribute to repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure or mis­car­riages.

Chron­ic endometri­tis is par­tic­u­lar­ly rel­e­vant. This per­sis­tent inflam­ma­tion of the uter­ine lin­ing often caus­es no symp­toms and there­fore usu­al­ly remains unde­tect­ed with­out tar­get­ed test­ing. It can be detect­ed by an endome­tri­al biop­sy and test­ing for CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells. The clin­i­cal evi­dence for this diag­nos­tic approach is stronger than for many oth­er spe­cial­ized endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tions.

Stud­ies also show asso­ci­a­tions between changes in the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me and implan­ta­tion and the course of preg­nan­cy. Among oth­er things, reduced dom­i­nance of lac­to­bacil­li and an increased pres­ence of cer­tain oth­er bac­te­ria are being inves­ti­gat­ed. How­ev­er, it has not yet been con­clu­sive­ly clar­i­fied which com­po­si­tion of the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me should be con­sid­ered opti­mal and whether tar­get­ed treat­ment of dys­bio­sis improves preg­nan­cy or live birth rates.

In our view, extend­ed endome­tri­al diag­nos­tics should there­fore not be per­formed rou­tine­ly for every patient try­ing to con­ceive. How­ev­er, in cas­es of repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure, recur­rent mis­car­riages, or select­ed com­plex fer­til­i­ty his­to­ries, it can pro­vide addi­tion­al infor­ma­tion. Which test is appro­pri­ate in an indi­vid­ual case is decid­ed based on your med­ical his­to­ry, pre­vi­ous treat­ments, and exist­ing findings—also tak­ing into account the vary­ing sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence for the indi­vid­ual pro­ce­dures.

Addi­tion­al diag­nos­tics when try­ing to con­ceive

HORMONAL DIAGNOSTICS

Hor­mon­al fac­tors can influ­ence the cycle, ovu­la­tion, and the build-up of the uter­ine lin­ing. Depend­ing on the clin­i­cal ques­tion, we may exam­ine, for exam­ple, thy­roid val­ues, pro­lactin, estra­di­ol and prog­es­terone, as well as oth­er hor­mones, in order to iden­ti­fy pos­si­ble hor­mon­al caus­es.

Hys­teroscopy

A hys­teroscopy allows the uter­ine cav­i­ty to be assessed direct­ly. For exam­ple, polyps, sub­mu­cos­al fibroids, adhe­sions, or oth­er changes that may impair implan­ta­tion can be detect­ed. If need­ed, tar­get­ed tis­sue sam­ples can also be tak­en dur­ing the pro­ce­dure.

Oth­er caus­es of implan­ta­tion fail­ure and mis­car­riages

In cas­es of repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure or recur­rent mis­car­riages, we do not only look at the uter­ine lin­ing. Depend­ing on your med­ical his­to­ry, fur­ther inves­ti­ga­tions may be useful—for exam­ple, of uter­ine anato­my, genet­ics, coag­u­la­tion, immunol­o­gy, or male fac­tors.

Pro­ce­dure for endome­tri­al diag­nos­tics

At our pri­vate fer­til­i­ty cen­ter in Munich, we guide you step by step through diag­nos­tics and pos­si­ble treat­ment options. Which test is appro­pri­ate and when the tis­sue sam­ple is tak­en depends on the spe­cif­ic clin­i­cal ques­tion. Some tests can be per­formed flex­i­bly with­in the cycle, while oth­ers require a pre­cise­ly defined time point.

  1. Indi­vid­ual plan­ning

    First, we dis­cuss which endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tion is appro­pri­ate in your sit­u­a­tion. The tim­ing of the biop­sy is planned accord­ing­ly: tests for chron­ic endometri­tis or CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells and the micro­bio­me can gen­er­al­ly be per­formed in dif­fer­ent phas­es of the cycle. Spe­cial tests such as uter­ine killer cells, on the oth­er hand, require a specif­i­cal­ly defined time point in the cycle, in the luteal phase.

    Make an appoint­ment
  2. Tak­ing the tis­sue sam­ple

    Using a thin catheter, we take a small sam­ple of the uter­ine lin­ing. The exam­i­na­tion takes only a few min­utes and is usu­al­ly per­formed on an out­pa­tient basis. Depend­ing on the test, the biop­sy is per­formed, for exam­ple, in the first half of the cycle, around ovu­la­tion, or specif­i­cal­ly in the sec­ond half of the cycle.

  3. Lab­o­ra­to­ry analy­sis

    Depend­ing on the clin­i­cal ques­tion, the sam­ple is exam­ined in dif­fer­ent ways. Options include his­to­log­i­cal and immuno­his­to­chem­i­cal test­ing for CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells, a mol­e­c­u­lar bio­log­i­cal analy­sis of the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me, or deter­mi­na­tion of uter­ine killer cells.

  4. Dis­cus­sion of results

    Once the results are avail­able, we dis­cuss the find­ings with you in detail and inter­pret them togeth­er in the con­text of your med­ical his­to­ry and pre­vi­ous fer­til­i­ty treat­ments. Espe­cial­ly with spe­cial­ized endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tions, it is impor­tant not to assess indi­vid­ual lab­o­ra­to­ry val­ues in iso­la­tion.

  5. Indi­vid­ual Treat­ment

    If chron­ic endometri­tis is con­firmed, for exam­ple, antibi­ot­ic ther­a­py may be appro­pri­ate. In the case of micro­bio­me changes or oth­er abnor­mal­i­ties, we assess indi­vid­u­al­ly whether this leads to a ther­a­peu­tic con­se­quence. In doing so, we also take into account the vary­ing sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence for the respec­tive treat­ment.

Close-up of a flower vase in the bright practice atmosphere at the fertility center in Munich for a relaxed consultation.

Endome­tri­al diag­nos­tics in Munich – indi­vid­u­al­ized and evi­dence-based

With spe­cial­ized inves­ti­ga­tions of the uter­ine lin­ing, it is not only the lab­o­ra­to­ry find­ing that mat­ters, but above all its inter­pre­ta­tion in the con­text of your indi­vid­ual fer­til­i­ty his­to­ry.

Arrange a con­sul­ta­tion appoint­ment
  • Time & trust

    In a calm, pro­tect­ed atmos­phere, we take suf­fi­cient time for your ques­tions and concerns—sensitively and on an equal foot­ing, from woman to woman.

  • Spe­cialised expe­ri­ence

    We have many years of expe­ri­ence in car­ing for patients with repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure, recur­rent mis­car­riages, and com­plex fer­til­i­ty his­to­ries.

  • Tar­get­ed diag­nos­tics

    Not every avail­able test is use­ful for every patient. We decide indi­vid­u­al­ly which endome­tri­al diag­nos­tics can pro­vide addi­tion­al insights based on your med­ical his­to­ry and pre­vi­ous find­ings.

  • Dif­fer­en­ti­at­ed inter­pre­ta­tion of find­ings

    Whether CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells, the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me, or spe­cial­ized addi­tion­al diag­nos­tics: we do not view results in iso­la­tion, but togeth­er with your pre­vi­ous treat­ments and oth­er pos­si­ble caus­es.

  • Evi­dence-based coun­sel­ing

    The sci­en­tif­ic evi­dence is not the same for all endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tions. We dis­cuss trans­par­ent­ly with you what is well stud­ied, where sci­en­tif­ic uncer­tain­ties remain, and which ther­a­peu­tic con­se­quences can rea­son­ably be derived from this.

 

What Our Patients Say

Posted on Google Google
Sandra B
105 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Had a very good experience, I felt very well taken care of, everyone very professional, standardized routines, can definitely recommend
Posted on Google Google
Lauren W
141 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We flew from overseas to work with Dr Mann and her team. Everyone was so kind, empathetic and extremely helpful. Everyone spoke English and made us feel very welcome. We could not have asked for better care than what we received from Dr Mann and her team. Bonus, the offices are beautiful.
Posted on Google Google
Andrea C
185 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
After visiting two other fertility clinics (one of which I left in tears), I had almost lost hope of finding a place where I would truly feel heard. Then I met Dr. Sarah Comploj, and everything changed. From the very first consultation, I felt genuinely listened to and treated as an individual. Unlike my previous experiences, where I was quickly told I needed IVF without anyone really taking the time to understand my situation or carefully review my test results, here I felt that my case truly mattered. Every step was explained thoughtfully, and my concerns were taken seriously. What stood out the most was that I never felt like just another patient or that the focus was on money. Instead, I felt that the entire team was committed to helping me achieve my dream in the most appropriate and personal way possible. Today, I am holding my one-month-old baby in my arms, and I will forever be grateful for the care, compassion, and expertise I received here. I can only highly recommend this clinic and Dr. Comploj 🩷
Posted on Google Google
Viktoria O
323 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Every appointment I’ve had over the last few months has been consistently informative, professional, and conducted in a personal manner. The treatment plan was explained in detail and any concerns or questions always answered. She also speaks perfect English if required. I’m impressed with how well organised the clinic is and how quickly results are processed, and last-minute appointments made available. For anyone who is going through the struggle of infertility it’s a difficult and vulnerable time, but I always felt so reassured and in good hands with Dr Mann.
Posted on Google Google
Local R
331 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
A heartfelt thank you to Dr. Gerber for the exceptional support and warmth during a very sensitive journey. I always felt respected and in good hands. Truly grateful.
Posted on Google Google
V D
452 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I'm very grateful for my experience, the staff from reception to the doctors were very kind. You can feel accompanied during the treatment. Also, overall I had a successful treatment, especially considering my age, it's a costly treatment but it's worth it. So I'm very happy for the result, my doctor was Sara Comploj.
Posted on Google Google
Marina
489 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had a wonderful experience with the Kinderwunsch practice, and especially with dr. Corina Mann. From the very beginning, dr Mann was attentive, knowledgeable, and truly invested in helping me achieve the best possible outcome. She took the time to understand my goals and tailored my treatment plan to make sure I had the best chance of success. Thanks to her care and expertise, I was able to maximise my results and reach my goals. I always felt supported, informed, and in the best hands. Dr Mann always answered my countless questions with a smile :) I’m incredibly grateful for her dedication and would wholeheartedly recommend her to anyone starting their fertility journey.
Posted on Google Google
Carmencita
491 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I just want to say a big thank you to the whole team of Dr. Mann and Dr. Albrecht. I felt really taking care off in this Praxis and really can recommend everyone to go to this clinic, as here you can get at least the most possible personalization and time dedicated to you! Thanks again for your support!
Posted on Google Google
Maria K
587 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Since my doctor was busy and couldn't do the procedure herself, I had an appointment with Sarah to have my fallopian tubes checked. I was very nervous before the procedure, but it turned out to be for nothing! Sarah described and explained every step of the procedure and was extremely friendly.
Posted on Google Google
Jay B
1149 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Our multiple years-long Kinderwunsch journey was spent under the care of Dr. Mann and her Kinderwunsch practice team. Dr. Mann is not only a highly competent expert in her field, she's also empathetic and kind. She treated each appointment with a sense of being genuinely invested — listening to concerns or questions, planning for my unique treatment needs, and explaining processes or procedures without rushing (because she knows it's likely your first time going through something ... even though it might be her 40000th time). Her practice is busy and it's because she's the best. The practice team is cheerful and helpful. The waiting area is comfortable with pleasant music, flowers, and they even laid out gingerbread during Christmas time. They have a lab on-site so results are often same-day. I particularly found the technology they use to share results via email quickly so helpful. And I always felt at ease speaking in my native language and not pressured to try to keep up with unfamiliar German terminology. I'm forever grateful to have found Dr. Mann. We plan to visit soon with our new plus-one :) - RB & JB
Posted on Google Google
Aparna P
1649 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Dr.Albrecht is really good and friendly. She is best at her own way. But reception staff is very very very worst and disappointing. They themselves book an appointment and say it’s not booked. Luckily in Doctorlib my appointment was visible. Staff is very very rude. And they respond very rudely. I can give 0 rating for Staff at reception.
Posted on Google Google
Cindy L
1670 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
We had an absolutely wonderful experience with Dr. Mann. Her positive energy and competence was so reassuring and much appreciated during the potentially stressful time of trying to have a baby. I really loved how we could communicate in either English or German over complicated and sensitive reproductive matters. She took the time to answer all of our questions and offered us a wealth of information regarding the treatments. And her staff brought the same good vibes and Expertise to the practice. Some of the best and painless blood draws I’ve ever had, and they were always very responsive through emails as well as telephone communication. Online appointment system was also great. Video consults super convenient. The setting of the practice itself is an oasis of peace and calmness. As soon as I stepped through the doors I felt relaxed with the music, green plant wall, and well designed and decorated space. Technology and quality of equipment is very good. Yes, sometimes the waiting time had been 30+ minutes, but because the patient care is so excellent, I’ll be back for future treatments as needed, and would highly recommend this practice and team to anyone.
Posted on Google Google
Raluca O
1854 days ago
Trustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I have only the best words to describe my experience at the clinic. I personally worked with Dr. Albrecht and she was amazing. Every appointment was done on time, informative and clear on what the next steps are. She offered details and support with my every question. Where I wasn’t sure of my German we swapped to English to make sure I understood everything. The clinic is run in a very efficient way, organized, planned and as a process oriented person I loved it!
Logo Ikon

Costs of endome­tri­al diag­nos­tics in Munich

Endome­tri­al biop­sy (micro­bio­me, uter­ine killer cells, ERA) — approx. €200

In addi­tion, there are costs for the exter­nal lab­o­ra­to­ries that ana­lyze the sam­ples. These ser­vices are billed to you direct­ly by the exter­nal lab­o­ra­to­ry.

Make an appoint­ment
Notes on Billing

No fixed or flat-rate prices: We bill on the basis of the offi­cial scale of fees for doc­tors (GOÄ). Accord­ing to the GOÄ, we are not allowed to quote fixed or flat-rate prices for med­ical ser­vices. The prices men­tioned are intend­ed to pro­vide ori­en­ta­tion and are typ­i­cal for the treat­ments men­tioned.

Pos­si­ble VAT lia­bil­i­ty: Med­ical ser­vices may be sub­ject to VAT (cur­rent­ly 19%). This applies if, after diag­nos­tics have been car­ried out, no med­ical indi­ca­tion or con­firmed diag­no­sis is present and it is there­fore not a med­ical treat­ment in the strict sense. This can be the case in par­tic­u­lar with social freez­ing treat­ments, but also with the treat­ment of sin­gle moms and same-sex cou­ples.

Note on Cost Cov­er­age

We would be hap­py to pro­vide you with detailed cost infor­ma­tion for the planned treat­ment in advance. This allows you to clar­i­fy cost cov­er­age with your pri­vate health insur­ance (PKV) as best as pos­si­ble before­hand. Statu­to­ry health insur­ance (GKV) does not cov­er costs at our cen­ter.

Fre­quent­ly asked ques­tions about endome­tri­al diag­nos­tics for an unful­filled wish to have a child

What is chron­ic endometri­tis (CE) and what role does it play when try­ing to con­ceive?

Chron­ic endometri­tis is an inflam­ma­tion of the uter­ine lin­ing that usu­al­ly caus­es few symp­toms or goes unno­ticed. It is asso­ci­at­ed with repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure and recur­rent mis­car­riages and can there­fore be inves­ti­gat­ed as a pos­si­ble addi­tion­al fac­tor in rel­e­vant fer­til­i­ty his­to­ries. Because chron­ic endometri­tis often does not cause typ­i­cal symp­toms, a tar­get­ed exam­i­na­tion of the uter­ine lin­ing is usu­al­ly required for diag­no­sis.

How is chron­ic endometri­tis diag­nosed?

For diag­no­sis, a small tis­sue sam­ple is tak­en from the uter­ine lin­ing. In the lab­o­ra­to­ry, it is exam­ined his­to­log­i­cal­ly and immuno­his­to­chem­i­cal­ly. Par­tic­u­lar­ly impor­tant is the detec­tion of CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells, which may indi­cate chron­ic inflam­ma­tion. Since there is cur­rent­ly no inter­na­tion­al­ly uni­form cut-off val­ue for the num­ber of plas­ma cells, the result should always be assessed togeth­er with the med­ical his­to­ry and pre­vi­ous fer­til­i­ty treat­ments.

Can chron­ic endometri­tis impair implan­ta­tion or increase the risk of mis­car­riage?

Stud­ies show an asso­ci­a­tion between chron­ic endometri­tis and low­er preg­nan­cy and live birth rates. Its sig­nif­i­cance is being inves­ti­gat­ed par­tic­u­lar­ly in cas­es of repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure and recur­rent mis­car­riages. How­ev­er, whether chron­ic endometri­tis is actu­al­ly the cause of the absence of preg­nan­cy or a mis­car­riage in an indi­vid­ual case can­not be deter­mined on the basis of the find­ing alone.

How is chron­ic endometri­tis treat­ed?

In cas­es of clin­i­cal­ly rel­e­vant chron­ic endometri­tis, antibi­ot­ic treat­ment may be appro­pri­ate. Depend­ing on the ini­tial find­ings and the indi­vid­ual sit­u­a­tion, a repeat endome­tri­al biop­sy may then be per­formed to check whether the inflam­ma­tion has resolved. Stud­ies show, in part, high­er preg­nan­cy and live birth rates after suc­cess­ful­ly treat­ed chron­ic endometri­tis; how­ev­er, the evi­dence is still het­ero­ge­neous.

What is the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me?

The endome­tri­al micro­bio­me refers to the total­i­ty of microor­gan­isms detectable in the uterus. Stud­ies are cur­rent­ly inves­ti­gat­ing, in par­tic­u­lar, the sig­nif­i­cance of lac­to­bacil­li and oth­er bac­te­ria for the uter­ine lin­ing, implan­ta­tion of an embryo, and the course of preg­nan­cy. Unlike the vagi­nal micro­bio­me, the bac­te­r­i­al load in the endometri­um is very low, which makes test­ing and inter­pre­ta­tion par­tic­u­lar­ly chal­leng­ing.

Can a dis­rupt­ed uter­ine micro­bio­me impair implan­ta­tion?

Some stud­ies show asso­ci­a­tions between cer­tain changes in the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me and low­er implan­ta­tion, preg­nan­cy, or live birth rates. How­ev­er, it has not yet been con­clu­sive­ly clar­i­fied whether these changes are actu­al­ly the cause of impaired implan­ta­tion or are mere­ly asso­ci­at­ed with it. There are also no gen­er­al­ly accept­ed cut-off val­ues for what an “opti­mal” endome­tri­al micro­bio­me should look like.

When can a micro­bio­me test be use­ful when try­ing to con­ceive?

Analy­sis of the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me is not part of rou­tine fer­til­i­ty diag­nos­tics. In select­ed patients with repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure, recur­rent mis­car­riages, or com­plex fer­til­i­ty his­to­ries, it may be dis­cussed as an addi­tion­al test fol­low­ing indi­vid­ual coun­sel­ing.

What are uter­ine killer cells and what is their sig­nif­i­cance when try­ing to con­ceive?

Uter­ine nat­ur­al killer cells (uNK cells) are a nor­mal and impor­tant com­po­nent of the immune sys­tem of the uter­ine lin­ing. Among oth­er things, they are involved in implan­ta­tion and ear­ly pla­cen­tal devel­op­ment. Whether an increased num­ber or altered activ­i­ty of these cells caus­es repeat­ed implan­ta­tion fail­ure or mis­car­riages has not yet been clear­ly estab­lished.

How is an endome­tri­al biop­sy per­formed, and is it painful?

For an endome­tri­al biop­sy, a thin catheter is insert­ed through the cervix into the uterus and a small sam­ple of the uter­ine lin­ing is tak­en. The pro­ce­dure usu­al­ly takes only a few min­utes and can be per­formed on an out­pa­tient basis. Dur­ing sam­pling, short-term men­stru­al-like pain or cramps may occur. Anes­the­sia is gen­er­al­ly not required.

When in the cycle is an endome­tri­al biop­sy per­formed?

The opti­mal time depends on which endome­tri­al inves­ti­ga­tion is planned. Test­ing for chron­ic endometri­tis or CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells can gen­er­al­ly be per­formed in dif­fer­ent phas­es of the cycle. For oth­er tests, tim­ing is more impor­tant: uter­ine killer cells are typ­i­cal­ly exam­ined in the sec­ond half of the cycle. We there­fore plan the tim­ing of the biop­sy indi­vid­u­al­ly accord­ing to the spe­cif­ic clin­i­cal ques­tion.

How much do endome­tri­al diag­nos­tics cost, and does health insur­ance cov­er the costs?

The costs depend on which inves­ti­ga­tions are per­formed. In addi­tion to the endome­tri­al biop­sy, costs may arise for his­to­log­i­cal, immuno­his­to­chem­i­cal, or mol­e­c­u­lar bio­log­i­cal analyses—for exam­ple, for CD138-pos­i­tive plas­ma cells, the endome­tri­al micro­bio­me, or uter­ine killer cells. As a rule, these spe­cial­ized inves­ti­ga­tions are not cov­ered by statu­to­ry health insur­ance. With pri­vate health insur­ance, pos­si­ble reim­burse­ment depends on the med­ical indi­ca­tion and the indi­vid­ual plan. We will, of course, inform you of the expect­ed costs before the exam­i­na­tion.